Soybean productivity depending on varietal characteristics, plant nutrition and application of herbicides
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28983/asj.y2023i12pp53-58Keywords:
soybean, productivity, variety, diet, herbicidesAbstract
In the unfavorable climatic and soil conditions of the Lower Volga region and the Saratov region, the characteristics of the growth and development of soybean (Glicine hispida Maxim) were studied. The most important factor determining the rate of growth and development of plants in an arid region is soil moisture during the sowing period and throughout the growing season. The duration of the sowing-emergence period was most influenced by soil moisture and temperature. The comparative productivity of soybean varieties of different ripeness groups (early ripening - Soer-4, Soer-5, mid-early - Natali and Zernogradskaya-2) was considered depending on weather conditions, varietal characteristics, diet and herbicide use. It has been shown that agrotechnical techniques for caring for plants must be started early. These primarily include weed control and the creation of an optimal soybean nutrition regime. The best way to control weeds turned out to be the application of a combination of herbicides Begin Turbo (for cultivation) and Pivot (during the growing season), which reduced the infestation of crops by 6.7 times and increased the yield by 18.3–32.1% compared to the control. The application of small doses of fertilizers (N30P60) had a positive effect on the development of soybean plants. In our studies, in the most moisture-rich year of 2020, the mid-early variety Natali had the maximum seed yield - 1.15 t/ha when N30P60 was applied. On average over 3 years, the Natali variety also gave the highest yield - 0.95 t/ha. In the early ripening varieties Soer-4 and Soer-5, the seed yield was 0.17–0.12 t/ha lower compared to the mid-early variety Natali.
Downloads
References
Антипов И. С. Соя – универсальная культура // Земледелие. 2000. № 1. С.15.
Детистова И. В. Применение перспективных гербицидов в посевах сои в Волгоградской области // Агроэкологические аспекты земледелия в аграрной зоне Поволжья: сб. науч. тр. Волгоград: ВГСХА, 1999. С. 152–154.
Доспехов Б. А. Методики полевого опыта. 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Агропромиздат, 1982. 416 с.
Методические указания по коллекции зерновых бобовых культур / И. И. Корсаков [и др.]. Л.: ВИР, 1975. 59 с.
Патирова Р. Н., Гудков Ю. Л. Путевой анализ элементов структуры урожая семян у сои // Генетика. 1979. Т. 5. № 1. С. 131–137.
Попов И. С., Дмитриенко А. П. Протеиновое питание животных. М.: Колос, 1975. С. 153–156.
Рекомендации по методике проведения наблюдений и исследований в полевом опыте / НИИСХ Юго-Востока. Саратов: Приволж. кн. изд-во, 1973. 223 с.
Фронтьер для защиты нута / В. Б. Лебедев [и др.]. // Защита растений. 2003. № 12. С. 28.
Johnson H. W., Bernard R. L. Genetics and breeding soybean // The soybean: genetics, breeding, physiology, nutrition, management. New York; London, 1967. P. 5–92.
Joshi A. B., Singh H. B., Mital S. P. Somy day soybean may come into its own // India Frorm. 1962. No. 8. P. 15–18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Agrarian Scientific Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.