Analysis of the productivity of discrete action machines used for mechanized planting of seedlings

Authors

  • Kristina Nikolaevna Chernik Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
  • Vladimir Andreevich Lozovoy Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28983/asj.y2024i1pp136-144

Keywords:

productivity, mechanization, reforestation, planting machine, seedlings

Abstract

Today in the world there are a large number of forest planters, devices and units. All of them perform one technological process - they prepare a seat for planting material, feed a seedling into it and close up the roots with soil. Mechanized landing technology can be divided into two types: discrete action and continuous action. One of the differences between these planting technologies is the implementation of the preparation of the seat: in the form of a continuous furrow (continuous action), or discretely located holes (discrete action). Since the need for mechanization of tree planting in Russia has recently increased, and this is due to the development strategy of the forestry complex of the Russian Federation, the introduction of advanced technologies and methods for artificial reforestation, in particular, planting seedlings with a closed root system, is an actual direction. In addition, in the Russian Federation, the share of manual labor when planting seedlings is large. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to identify a promising type of planting for the territory of the Russian Federation of seedlings with a closed root system for further improvement by analyzing the performance of discrete action machines. The objects of the study were three discrete forest planters common in Europe: Bracke (Sweden production), M-Planter (Finland production) and Risutec (Finland production). On average, the productivity of forest planters of discrete action is 300 seedlings per hour. The following factors influenced the performance: stoniness, stumps, surface obstacles, humus layer, cutting residues, number of planting heads on the planter, soil type and operator experience. The use of foreign machines of discrete action in the Russian Federation is irrational to use for the following reasons: low productivity;  significant cost; require high costs during operation, maintenance and storage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Вербицкая Н.О., Чекотин Р.С., Корж М.А. Влияние харвестерных лесозаготовок на повреждение почвенного покрова // Леса России и хозяйство в них. 2018. №2 (65). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-harvesternyh-lesozagotovok-na-povrezhdenie-pochvennogo-pokrova (дата обращения: 06.07.2023).

Дебков Н.М. Опыт создания лесных культур посадочным материалом с закрытой корневой системой // Изв. вузов. лесн. журн. 2021. № 5. С. 192–200. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-5-192-200

Драпалюк М. В., Стасюк В. В., Зеликов В. А. Новые конструкции универсальных лесопасадочных машин для посадки сеянцев с открытой и закрытой корневой системой // Лесотехнический журнал. 2021. Т. 11. № 4 (44). С. 112–123. Библиогр.: с. 119–123 (26 назв.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2021.4/10.

Корчагов С. А., Грибов С. Е., Обрядина О. Ю. Экономическая оценка создания лесных культур различным видом посадочного материала. Известия высших учебных заведений. Лесной журнал. 2017. № 5 (359). С. 92-102. DOI 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2017.5.92.

Петухов И. Н. Лесоводственная эффективность создания лесных культур сеянцами с закрытой корневой системой в условиях костромской области // Вестник МГУЛ – Лесной вестник. 2011. №3. URL:https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lesovodstvennaya-effektivnost-sozdaniya-lesnyh-kultur-seyantsami-s-zakrytoy-kornevoy-sistemoy-v-usloviyah-kostromskoy-oblasti (дата обращения: 06.07.2023).

Проказин Н. Е., Бартенев И. М., Родин С. А. Динамика приживаемости и роста культур сосны обыкновенной на горельнике в лесостепной зоне. Современная лесная наука: проблемы и перспективы : Материалы Всероссийской научно-практической конференции, Воронеж, 20–22 декабря 2017 года. Воронеж, 2017. С. 335-338.

Шихов А. Н., Зарипов А. С. Многолетние тренды потерь лесов от пожаров и ветровалов на северо-востоке Европейской России // Современные проблемы дистанционного зондирования Земли из космоса: сб. тезисов докладов шестнадцатой Всерос. открытой конф. М., 2018. С. 453.

Back Tomas Ersson. Concepts for Mechanized Tree Planting in Southern Sweden / Back Tomas Ersson // Faculty of Forest Sciences. Doctoral Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Ume?. 2014. P. 78.

Ghaffariyan M. R. A short review on studies on work productivity of mechanical tree planting // Silva Balcanica. 2021;22(2): 25-32. https://doi.org/10.3897/silvabalcanica.22.e64233

Ersson B.T. Possible concepts for mechanized tree planting in southern Sweden – an intro-ductory essay on forest technology // Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen f?r skoglig resurshush?llning, Arbetsrapport. 2010; 269. 51 p.

Errson B.T. Concepts for mechanized tree planting in Southern Sweden. PhD Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. 2014.78 p.

Hallonborg U., von Hofsten H., Mattsson S., Hagberg J., Thors?n ?., Nystr?m C., Arvidsson H. Mechanized planting with the Silva Nova tree planter – recent state and feasibility compared with manual planting. Skogforsk, Redog?relse. 1995;(6):95.

Hallonborg U., von Hofsten H., Mattsson S., Thors?n ?. Forestry planting machines – a description of the methods and the machines. Skogforsk, Redog?relse 1997;7. 24 p.

Kaila S. The G.A. Serlachius planting machine. Test report to the machine. Mets?teho Review 9/1984. 6 p.

Laine T., Rantala J.. Mechanized tree planting with an excavator-mounted M-Planter planting device. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 2013;24(3):183–193.

Laine T., Saarinen V.-M. Comparative study of the Risutec Automatic Plant Container (APC) and Bracke planting devices. Silva Fennica 2014vol. 48 no. 3 article id 1161. 16 p.

Laine T., K?rh? K., Hyn?nen A. A survey of the Finnish mechanized tree-planting industry in 2013 and its success factors. Silva Fennica 2016vol. 50 no. 2 article id 1323. 14 p. http://dx.doi. org/10.14214/sf.1323.

Laine T. Mechanized tree planting in Finland and improving its productivity. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki, 2017.48 pp.

Lideskog H. A methodology for automation of mechanized forest regeneration. Phd Thesis. Luleе University of Technology, 2018.73 pp.

Ramantswana M., Guerra S.P.S., Ersson B.T. Advances in the Mechanization of Regenerating Plantation Forests: a Review. CurrForestryRep 2020;(6):143-158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-020-00114-7.

Rantala J., Harstela P., Saarinen V-M., Tervo L. A techno-economic evaluation of Bracke and M-planter tree planting devices. Silva Fennica 2009;43(4):659–667. http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/ sf.186.

Rantala J., Laine T. (2010). Productivity of the M-Planter tree-planting device in practice. Silva Fennica. 2010;44(5):859–869. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/sf.125.

von Hofsten H. The ?je-Planter machine - good performance at a competitive cost. Skogforsk, Resultat 3/1993. 4 p.

Published

2024-02-06

Issue

Section

Agroengineering